Questions on the upcoming exams

In our last seminar I was recieved some questions on the upcoming exams. I just wanted to go over some pointers:
 
1) I am sure a lot of you will be relieved to hear this! It is recommended that you concentrate on a minimum of four areas from the curriculum and not more than five. The exam comes in the format of essay questions and you will choose two questions from a list of eleven or so, by concentrating on five areas of the curriculum you would probably be better equipped to answer any question you choose in depth. On another note, the essay questions you chose as part of your previous assignments should have no bearing on the exam question you happen to choose in your exam.
 
2) In terms of citation in the exam, it would be good to go over a good number of theories and studies as part of your revison for the exam, the key point is to apply your knowledge to the question and to demonstrate key sociological skills, as was necessary when writing your essays. To revise essay technique I recommend you visit this online tutorial (I sent this tutorial before, if you remember) and go through it again as part of your revision:
 
http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/arts/sociology/index.xml
 
3) Nevertheless, don’t get too bogged down with the exact year of a study or work, as relaying relevant key theories would get you good marks. Think of it as a spectrum, the more you put in, whether it be accurate and relevant relay of information, citation of relevant studies etc., the higer grades you will achieve. Tackling exam questions are similar to tackling essay questions, however more flexibility is given in the marking of exam questions, due to the time constraints and lack of access to references.
 
4) The exam date is not officially set, however the provisional date for now is the 6th of May at 9:30 AM. The date could change, but consider that the date for your exams would be roughly around that time. It’s actually one of the early exams set in the provisional timetable.
 
5) For past exam papers, visit the student portal and put in your username and password. From the portal you can download past papers. Here’s the link (Just enter your username and password):
 
https://portal.gre.ac.uk/cp/home/displaylogin
 
I will also be handing out sample papers for our next seminar.
 
6) As for the workshops, I was first requested to finalize details and dates, so that a room can be booked. In our last seminar, we had some disagreement within the first group (11-12), however the second group (12-1) gave preference to a Tuesday afternoon. Would everyone be able to fit in a Tuesday to their schedule, if you can’t make it to the afternoon session, we can always set another workshop on the same day, to do go over the same topics, but run at another time (similar to how our seminars are split into two different groups e.g. 12PM - 2PM & 2PM - 4PM). If we were to have two duplicate seminars, I would prefer them to be on the same date. Either way, please send an email with your preferences, so I can then go about booking a room. However, seeing that the Modern Societies exam is early, the workshops can still be used after exams, as part of your further studies/revision for sociology.
If you have any further question, just send me an email - modernsocieties@gmail.com

Best wishes,

Basem

Seminar Twenty One: Capitalism/Anti-Capitalism, Evironment and Crisis

Overproduction, the environment and the general law of capitalist accumulation 
I recommend you start with Allan Schnaiberg’s treadmill of production theory (which ties in the production process within competitive capitalism with its impact on the environment). Then have a look at similar theoretical inputs by both Dunlap & Catton.

Then after that have a look at the more recent trends in environmental sociology, especially through discoures in which:

… notions such as modernity, postmodernity, risk society, and ecological modernization figure prominently (e.g., Mol and Spaargaren 1993; Spaargaren and Mol 1992). Equally significant has been the drift of sociologists of science, and their notions of the social construction of scientific knowledge, into the environmental sociology arena as interest has grown in researching the environmental sciences and the connections of environmental knowledge production to environmental politics and the environmental movement (Taylor and Buttel 1992; Wynne 1994; Yearley 1991). 

Continue reading ‘Seminar Twenty One: Capitalism/Anti-Capitalism, Evironment and Crisis’

Seminar Twenty: The New World Order?

You can download the seminar’s presentation slide by clicking here …

To download the seminar’s handout click here …

To compliment the seminar’s slide, read Chapter 15 of ‘Sociology: Issues and Debates’ (Edited by Steve Taylor). The chapter is by Leslie Sklair and is titled ‘Globalization’. You can download the chapter by clicking here… 

Further Reading

Seminar Nineteen: The Deviant

The seminar slides were based on Giddens’ ‘Sociology’ (Chapter 19). The slides also compliment Chapter 11 of ‘Sociology: Issues and debates’ (edited by Steve Taylor). The chapter is titled ‘Crime & Deviance’ and is written by David Downes.

 Click here to download the seminar’s presentation slides, and click here to download the seminar’s handout.

I would also recommend you have a go through these extensivcnotes on the Sociology of Deviance and then to use it as a guide for your further readings.

http://www.umsl.edu/~keelr/200/intrdev.html

And here are some books you may find useful for your further reading:

  • Becker, H. 1997 Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance Simon & Schuster Ltd.
  • Burke, R. 2005 An Introduction to Criminological Theory Willan Publishing
  • Carrington, K., Hogg, R. 2002 Critical Criminology: Issues, Debates, Challenges Willan Publishing
  • Cohen, S. 2002 Folk Devils and Moral Panics: Creation of Mods and Rockers Routledge.
  • Downes, D., Rock, P. 2007 Understanding Deviance: A Guide to the Sociology of Crime and Rule-breaking Oxford University Press.
  • Goode, E., Ben Yehuda, N. 1994 Moral Panics: Social Construction of Deviance WileyBlackwell.
  • Kelly, D. 1996 Deviant Behavior: A Text-Reader in the Sociology of Deviance: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Rubington, E., Weinberg,M. 1968 Deviance, the Interactionist Perspective: Text and Readings in the Sociology: Macmillan.
  • Sumner, C. 1994 Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary Open University Press.

Seminar Eighteen: Power and the new politics

Intro

Let us look at the different meanings of power and then map out these meanings to the different theoretical approaches to power.

Three meanings of power:

  1. Power as ‘capacity’ i.e. the possession of control or command over others. The conception of power here is that of capacity, meaning the capacity to get others to do what you want them to do.
  2. Power as “legal ability, capacity or authority to act; especially delegated authority”. Here power is the ‘right’ that some people have to tell others what to do.
  3. Power as the “ability to do or affect something or anything”. Power, in this sense, relates to human agency; that is, to one’s ability to ‘make a difference’ in the world.

Finally, it should be noted that these three meanings of power can overlap. Continue reading ‘Seminar Eighteen: Power and the new politics’

Follow on from the last seminar (Religion in Modern Society) …

In the last seminar we mentioned trends that showed higher levels of religiosity in the United States, compared to Europe, yet ironically America has a stricter separation of state and religion, then say Britain. For example, Britain has an established state Church and a network of faith schools under the state sector  (where some individuals may claim membership of religious organizations to access these schools for their children). In the United States, on the other hand, there is a complete separation of religion from all state functions and provisions. At first it would seem that a state sponsor of a religious tradition would result in higher levels of religiosity, but in the case of Britain and the United States the opposite is true. To understand these differing trends you might want to consider the writings of Roger Finke & Rodney Stark. In their book ‘The Churching of America, 1776-1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy’ they liken religious activity to a marketplace. What concerns them most is the market supply of religion, and in countries where religious activity is deregulated, as in the United States, and there exists a vast plurality, each religious organisation is in competition with the other — as is the case when companies outbid each other in the production and marketing of consumer commodities. Continue reading ‘Follow on from the last seminar (Religion in Modern Society) …’

Seminar Seventeen: Religion in Modern Society

Secularization and Religious Revival

Secularization: the process by which religion loses its influence over various spheres of social life

Dimensions:

1. Membership of religious organizations:

Debates I

Membership of a religious organization may not mean anything to the individual and says nothing about levels of participation of belief…

 …but it is still a marker of identity and affiliation which may be a significant factor in social solidarity Continue reading ‘Seminar Seventeen: Religion in Modern Society’

Seminar Sixteen: Sexual Identities - Biology, Choice and Pleasure

Overview and issues to consider

  • Can we talk of fixed sexual identities? Is sexual activity synonymous with a given sexual identity? Further, Is ‘sexual orientation’ synonymous with a sexual identity?
  • Until recently, in western Europe, sexual activity was restricted by social norms. The history of sexuality has been dominated by the influence of Christianity which on the whole has treated heterosexuality as the only legitimate form of sexual expression and sex as an act acceptable only within marriage and only for the purposes of procreation. Continue reading ‘Seminar Sixteen: Sexual Identities - Biology, Choice and Pleasure’

Seminar Fifteen: Domesticity - Masculanism and Feminism

This seminar focuses on the sociology of gender, we will be looking at how gender is structured within social relations. Below is a general overview of the subject.

General overview

What is natural and what is social in gender? There is no consensus on this question, instead we have a variety of approaches, each seeking to provide an explanation on biological sex and gender identities. These vary from one end of the spectrum i.e. biological determinism to the other end of pure social constructivism. At one end, we have a strong biological determinist position that would argue that gender traits can be rooted in chromosomal differences, hormonal differences or some other natural difference. This strong determinist position is problematic, as for it to be established, universal differences need to be proven to exist and that these differences determine identical behaviour on the part of men and women across societies and over history. Continue reading ‘Seminar Fifteen: Domesticity - Masculanism and Feminism’

Seminar Fourteen: Essay writing workshop

Next Page »


 

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Useful Links